Search
| Books | New Products | Special Issues | Sample Articles | For Authors | Supplier Info
 
 
 

 

Article Abstracts

Published:Journal of Chromatographic Science, ISSN 0021-9665 Volume 45, Number 9, October 2007, pp. 578-586

Evaluation of Polymeric Methacrylate-based Monoliths in Capillary Electrochromatography for their Potential to Separate Pharmaceutical Compounds

Debby Mangelings[1], Indiana Tanret[1], Vanessa Meert[1], Sebastiaan Eeltink[2], Peter J. Schoenmakers[2],Wim Th. Kok[2], and Yvan Vander Heyden[1],
[1]Department of Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel-VUB, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium and
[2]Polymer-Analysis Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Polymeric methacrylate-based monoliths are evaluated in capillary electrochromatography (CEC) and pressurized capillary electrochromatography (p-CEC) for their potential in pharmaceutical analysis. Using a given polymerization mixture as a basis for the monolith synthesis, different mobile phase pH at constant organic modifier concentrations are tested in both CEC and p-CEC. The test set consists of basic, acidic, amphoteric, and neutral compounds, which are mainly pharmaceuticals. Because of the mainly hydrophobic character of the stationary phase, the interactions are largest when the compounds appear in an uncharged state, but some ion-exchange phenomena with negatively charged compounds can also be observed. In CEC, acidic substances are most retained at low pH. For amphoteric and neutral compounds, no preference regarding analyzing pH can be derived from these experiments. For basics, a high pH is chosen, but a reduced solvent strength is needed to enhance the retention of these compounds. The retention mechanism in p-CEC can also be assigned to both hydrophobic and ionic interactions. For acidic, amphoteric, and neutral compounds, acceptable retention is seen. For the basic compounds, the retention with a mobile phase containing 50% organic modifier is low, as in CEC. However, when the organic modifier content in the mobile phase is decreased, retention increases and the selectivity of the stationary phase is more pronounced. This mode of operation presents a possibility for separating some test mixtures, thus some potential for pharmaceutical analysis is seen. More efforts are needed to obtain higher efficiencies and better peak shapes, which might be solved by a further optimization of both the stationary phase synthesis and the mobile phase composition.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $4.00 per page.
Visa or MasterCard accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

Please indicate JCS volume and issue along with page numbers.

Site Map: Home | Current Issue | Subscribe | Back Issues | About Us | Meetings | Advertising |
| Books for Sale | For the Author | Links | Supplier Info | Search |