![]()
![]()
Published: Journal of Chromatographic Science, Volume 35, Number 2, February 1997, pp. 7581.
Dependence of Chromatogram Peak Areas
Obtained by Curve-Fitting on the Choice of Peak Shape Function
M.L. Phillips and R.L. White
Seven different chromatographic peak shape functions are evaluated for use with nonlinear least-squares curve-fitting for asymmetric peak area measurements. The four-parameter functions that are evaluated are unable to adapt to peaks exhibiting substantial tailing, which results in peak area underestimates. Peak tailing is more readily represented by using six- and eight-parameter functions; however, the use of these more flexible functions can result in peak area overestimation and inaccuracies for overlapping peaks. The exponentially modified Gaussian function is advocated for general purpose chromatogram curve fitting because it adapts to extended peak tailing better than the other four-parameter functions evaluated and provides better reproducibility when large digitization intervals are employed or when poor initial curve-fitting parameters are chosen than the six- and eight-parameter functions that were evaluated.
Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publishers permission.
| This article is available in its entirety by fax for $4.00 per page. Visa or MasterCard accepted. To order electronically click here Please indicate JCS volume and issue along with page numbers. |
Site Map: Home
| Current Issue | Subscribe
|
| Back Issues | About
Us | Meetings | Advertising
|
| Books for Sale | For
the Author | Links |
| Supplier Info |Search
|